THE DOJ IS IN A PICKLE. FOR THE SUPREMACISTS IN THE POLITICAL ARENA, NOW THAT THE POTUS HAS BEEN SUBJECT TO REMOVAL BY THE PEOPLE AND THE SCOTUS IS ABOUT TO BE SUBJECT TO LEGISLATIVE OVERSIGHT, THE SUPPOSEDLY MINISTERIAL DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, WHICH HAS GATHERED INVESTIGATION AND PLEA AGREEMENTS UNDER ITS MANTLE OF ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY, RISKS HAVING ITS OVERREACH EXPOSED IF IT FAILS TO PROSECUTE THE LATEST PROPONENT OF THE ABSOLUTE RULER PROPOSITION.

LOOKED AT OBJECTIVELY, THERE IS NO CONSTITUTIONAL BASIS FOR THE DEPARTMENTAL “POLICY” THAT A SITTING PRESIDENT CANNOT BE CHARGED WITH A CRIME AND HAS TO BE REMOVED FROM OFFICE FIRST. RATHER, WHAT THE DOJ DID WAS USURP THE AUTONOMY OF A MINISTERIAL POSITION TO CURRY FAVOR WITH THE EXECUTIVE. IN EFFECT, THE PROSECUTORS MADE A BARGAIN WITH THE EXECUTIVE TO LOOK THE OTHER WAY AND IGNORE VIOLATIONS OF LAW IN EXCHANGE FOR A GUARANTEE OF ALMOST CERTAIN SUCCESS.

TO A MERE CITIZEN THAT LOOKS LIKE A CORRUPT BARGAIN.

AND IT DID NOT START WITH DONALD TRUMP. HOW ELSE ARE THE UN-CONSTITUTIONAL DETENTIONS OF CAPTIVES AT BLACK SITES AND THEN AT GUANTANAMO TO BE EXPLAINED? WHAT ABOUT OBAMA POCKETING EVIDENCE OF THE TORTURE OF CIVILIANS IN IRAQ? HOW MUCH OF THE BUREAUCRACY IS SHIELDED FROM ACCOUNTABILITY BY EXTENDING ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY TO THE GUY AT THE TOP?