The easiest way to accumulate money is to steal it. Legal thievery makes it even easier.
So, Kavanaugh via judicial ruling facilitated Trump’s theft of money from the workers at a New Jersey casino, which was then pushed into bankruptcy so Trump could walk away rich.
The irony is that, except as a cover for predatory behavior, the stuff (money) is worthless. Does this worthlessness contribute to its use as a fig leaf for deception and chicanery?
An unanticipated consequence?
Money and the law are tools whose use either produces fairness and equity or abuse. The Cons have been relying on money and the law to promote their inequity. Equality really offends them because it flies in the face of their commitment to and insistance on superiority.
Both are recognized words which have been in use for a long time. Personification is rather common and refers to the assignment of human characteristics or behaviors to objects. Personifixation seems to have been used in the eighteenth century in connection with fanciful language.
That’s not what I am contemplating. What I am looking for is a word that describes that fixation some people have with persons qua person. It strikes me as rather primitive in that an individual’s attention is seemingly oblivious of another’s behavior, attitude, creativity or talent. Rather, interest is prompted by the perception of another person’s essence — similar perhaps to dog pee announcing another dog in the vicinity of a hydrant. I thought perhaps the word “personous” would do, but it’s not quite right in that the attention on persons qua persons verges on the irrational. Perhaps personifixation wooks. At least, unlike “deprivator,” it can be found in a dictionary.
Being that money is worthless, how much time does it take to turn it into something of real value, usefulness? If it takes an hour of labor to spend fifteen dollars, how long does it take to spend a million?
A new way of looking at money.
I need a new word for certificates of debt or IOUs. Arrogating CD for certificate of deposit was clever. Many people are averse to debt, so it is best not to talk about it. It used to be that “money” was tabu. But, that word has now been rehabilitated, in part because the word says nothing about the nature of what it references. A quantified debt. How can that be characterized to convey both the relationship and its dimension?
We are talking about unincorporated Glynn County, Georgia here, where the land laced with rivers, fresh water wetlands and marshes is distinguished as the “mainland” from the barrier islands on the edge of the ocean. While the terrain is somewhat higher (21′ instead of a maximum of 12′ above sea level), the water table is just as high and infiltration is slow. Transpiration by the maritime forests helps, but not once the forests are cut down. Open water bodies do little to ameliorate temperatures, though they do retard the runoff of fresh water to the sea. Continue reading →
That is the actual title of Stephen Moore’s opinion piece published in our local paper after it first appeared in Townhall I had to check because the title alone is reason enough to object. After all, regardless of the meaning of “liberal” and “work,” the reference to war tells us what is going on is bad. Continue reading →
Money is the middleman in the resource conversion business. Let Resource Land Holdings in Colorado Springs explain their mission:
RLH was founded in 1998 to invest in agricultural, timber and mining properties in the U.S. Through partnerships with local brokers, operators and entrepreneurs, RLH invests in properties across a broad range of resource-rich asset classes. To date, RLH has organized and managed two separately funded entities as well as four private equity funds. Resource Land Fund I was capitalized with $20 million in committed equity and made its first investment in December of 2001. Resource Land Fund II was capitalized with $51 million in committed equity and made its first investment in July of 2003. Resource Land Fund III was capitalized with $175 million and made its first investment in March 2006. All three funds are fully invested. RLF IV had a final closing in August 2010 of $316 million in equity commitments.
In the olden days it was called “Buy cheap and sell dear.”