Hannah's Blog: A Fly on the Wall

December 06, 2004

A Fly on the Wall

http://www.justaflyonthewall.com/

Another Election Held and Another Election Stolen

Another election held and another election stolen. In 2000 Bush stole the election by restricting the ability to vote by those people most likely to vote against him. The abuses were wide spread and the Democrats and other groups that believe in each individuals right to vote put together an impressive attempt to make sure that every individual that wanted to vote would not be turned away. Everywhere you went there was booths where new voters could register. Celebrities in commercials were urging voters to get out and vote. Poll watchers were placed in polling stations across the country to guarantee that every voter would not be turned away on any technicality.

What these well meaning groups failed to account for was that they were defending the 2000 election fixing plan and not taking into account that this election would be decided not by voters but by the rise of technology. Every one might be allowed to vote but their vote, and your vote made no difference at all. The programmers had already decided who would win and by how much.

Prior to this election I personally sent out information to the media which should have been provided to the electorate. It was not. The biggest turnout in history had no chance to win this election or any other unless the programmers of the voting machine allowed it. I believe they will allow it less and less as the machines control the elections and the Republicans control the machines.

This is not speculation. It is not a rant designed to make the losers feel better. I speak from first hand information and unless people stand up and act, democracy in this country is ended.

While employed at Wong Enterprises, Congressman Feeney had requested if Wong could write a voting program that could alter the vote and be undetectable. As the technology advisor, I explained that as long as the source code was provided and complied under supervision, code which altered the vote and was undetectable could not be built. Another problem would be that no one would trust a program that provided for no paper trail to substantiate its accuracy. When the vote was flipped the paper trail could easily detect the fraud.

This request was early in my exposure to Congressman Feeney, so I was not familiar with what a total piece of crap he truly was. My assumption was that he was worried that the other side (the Democrats) would introduce voting machines which could manipulate the vote. Mrs. Wong volunteered that we (meaning me) could put together a quick prototype that he could view and show others.

I have recreated that prototype and posted it at http://www.justaflyonthewall.com/votefraudprogram.htm. It is essentially the same code that I built for the vote fraud demo for Congressman Feeney. You will notice that by clicking on the correct hidden spots on the screen, the vote will flip so that the Republican candidate will receive fifty one percent of the vote. The hot spots make it possible to flip the vote as often as necessary yet it will never fire accidentally so as to avoid detection. My prototype was actually very simplistic. The actual sequence to flip the vote could be as complex as the programmer wished or even to operate automatically. In cases when the Republican is already leading, the vote is left as is. I built the program to demonstrate that with proper supervision that the election machines would be safe. The code would not be able to be hidden.

The next day I complete the prototype and presented it to Mrs. Wong. I stressed how the tampering could be detected. She quickly set me straight as the to true intention. Her exact words were "If we can?t hide the manipulation, we won?t get the contract the program is needed to control the south Florida vote." Another confirmation of why I needed to get a different job. I would not build something that would defraud every voter in this country. Even better, I knew that as long as the election supervisors used proper computer procedures, no one else would or could either.

What I did not anticipate was that this country would allow the placement of voting machines where the source code was not provided. The programs were pre-compiled (you have no idea what is in them or what hidden triggers exist), and where no paper trail would be required to check their accuracy. Any moron could build a voting program that could flip the vote under those circumstances and no amount of testing could discover the deception.

A reproduction of the prototype I developed at Wong for Congressman Feeney can be downloaded at http://www.justaflyonthewall.com/votefraudprogram.htm. It also includes the instructions for installing the program and manipulating the voting. Under normal circumstances it will accurately record the vote totals. By clicking on the proper hidden triggers the vote is manipulated and without a paper trail becomes altered in such a way as to be untraceable.

A major question might be why. Why would the Republicans choose to cheat? Vote fraud is by no means a new occurrence nor, is it confined to one particular party. The first vote fraud was very likely not far behind the first election ever held. The people who run and many of those who support them have a vested interest in making sure that their candidate wins. It?s about policy. It?s about ideology. Mostly, it?s about the money. By simply placing the proper technology in place they have assured victory in perpetuity. Each of their victories will weaken any opposition parties. You can already see it happening.

The Democrats have already started looking inward and pointing fingers at each other in order to explain a loss that was not possible. This is precisely what the Republicans expected. Exactly what occurred when Bush stole the 2000 election. The fighting and the finger pointing within the Democratic party does more to boost the Republicans than anything the Republicans can ever do. As they grouse about changing their message or their method of delivery, they project a message to the public that their message is insincere. Democrats need to believe what they believe. If that is what makes them a minority party then so be it. Be true to yourself, your goals and don?t change the package just to impress the masses. Most importantly make sure that the wins and losses are real and not just manipulations by a side that will do anything to win.

Did Bush win? Bush could not have won. Take Florida or Ohio. A switch of either would change the outcome. In reality Bush probably lost both. There have been many reports of people being registered as Republicans without their knowledge. Even with these inflated figures in Florida alone the Democrats out number the Republicans by over a half million votes. The exit polling, where voters are surveyed at the polling place immediately after voting, showed Kerry ahead by as much as nine percent in Florida. In Ohio the exit polling showed Kerry with a 60 to 40 lead. At the same time the actual vote continued to hover at the 51 to 49 margin in favor of Bush. We must assume that either the voters consistently lied to the surveyors or the vote was flipped. Even more telling was the extremely small margin of victory in the south Florida counties. The very counties that Mrs. Wong had told me were the ones that the vote fraud program was intended to control.

This was not an election where people were not strongly committed. The massive turnout and the new registration of voters were at an all time high. Even more important the Democrats were at the forefront. An Associated Press story less than a month before the election showed that the Democrats had registered more voters in the swing states such as Arizona, Iowa, New Mexico and New Hampshire.

Most important was the fact that everyone who viewed themselves as a Democrat was highly committed to voting Democratic. I personally did not meet a single person who said they were normally Democratic but were changing their vote this year.

Conversely, I spoke with several pre-Bush Republicans that were not only voting for the Democrats candidates but actively volunteering their time to help campaign for the Democrats. So in a highly polarized election where the Democrats outnumbered the Republicans in the swing states by several million votes, and the exit poll consistently demonstrated a Democratic lead, the Republicans still won. Who actually believes that?

What can we do about it? Not only has another election been stolen but our democracy is now gone. The machines decide, not the voters. First and foremost, we must insist that the machine be replaced by machines that can be verified vote for vote. Integrity of the vote is paramount to democracy. The breakdown of trust in the system will rob this country of any legitimacy. We must force out of office any Republicans that have been benefited by this betrayal.

Now if we were still in the mindset of the 1960?s the answer would be protest marches, personal attacks on Bush supporters, and destruction of government buildings. This has never been an approach that appeals to me. We can fix the problems without such aggressive tactics. We do however, have to make some noise. I believe we can do so through economic boycott and the recall of questionable election results. In areas where the machines that were used could not be validated or any other place where there is a possibility that the vote was manipulated, we need to begin recalls of any Republicans that came into office under questionable conditions. In cases where the recalls occur we need to insist that we use paper ballots and then report our votes to an non-partisan reporting group. Through these measures we can force them to replace the suspect machines with verifiable machines. If they fail to respond, we can simple recall the offenders until the machines are replaced. Cost is not a factor. I personally will provide a program free of charge to any election official that will electronically tabulate votes. It will be able to run on any standard computer. In fact, I am sure there are a thousand other programmers that would donate their time to provide code that would be publicly viewable, able to be compiled under non-partisan supervision, and provide a verifiable paper trail and receipt of voting. In effect, absolutely no cost to guarantee that each vote is counted correctly.

Besides just a recall of the suspect politicians, we can do even more. We can take away their dollars. The top supporters of Bush must be attacked. Now I?m not talking about burning their buildings or assaulting their executives. I am proposing a boycott of their products. In America we have many choices on which products we buy. Now that our freedom to select leaders has been circumvented we must employ the tactic that won in the battle for civil rights. Blacks voting rights were being infringed such that they had no political power. Even their economic power was fairly weak, but by boycotting those that supported discrimination they were able to force change.

By contrast our voting rights have been removed and replaced by a poorly disguised shell game. We do, however, control seventy plus percent of the economic power of this country. Following is a list of products that we need to avoid. By not purchasing the products of Bush supporters we can hit Bush where he will feel it most. Several of the products I prefer over the alternative choices but minor inconveniences are a small price to pay for getting our country back.

It is as simple as switching from Coca-Cola to Pepsi, changing your insurance company from Blue Cross, AFLAC, or American International Group to a neutral insurance company. On trips to Vegas, Biloxi or Detroit; choose accommodations not connected to MGM Mirage. If you have a credit card by MBNA or Bank of America just transfer the balance to a new non-Bush card. If you usually buy your gasoline, at two dollars plus a gallon, at Chevron or Texaco, just drive an extra block or two to someone else?s brand. Did you know the United Parcel Service is a big Bush donor. Use Fed-Ex or the Post office. Keep your money out of the pockets of those that are working against us.

To Download the Vote Fraud Program Click on the Link Below.

http://www.justaflyonthewall.com/votefraudprogram.htm

Please print this screen to retain the instructions for the Vote Fraud Prototype
Use Winzip to unzip the program. (If you don't have winzip you can download it for free at www.winzip.com )
Run the Setup.exe from the install menu
Install the program. You can use the defaults

As you can see it comes with the database pre-filled with several votes.
You can cast votes by clicking on a candidates name and clicking submit
To flip the vote to favor the Democrat over the Republican ? first click on the D in PRESIDENT and then click on the S in PRESIDENT
To flip the vote to favor the Republican over the Democrat ? first click on the R in PRESIDENT and then click on the S in PRESIDENT

This feature can be turned on or off so that it must be activated before it can work again. This prevents the feature from being accidentally tripped in case someone is running a test on the system.

1.The top left corner turns the vote fraud features off.

2.The bottom right corner turns the vote fraud feature on

3.The bottom left corner flips the vote to a Republican advantage of 51% if the vote fraud feature has been turned on.

4.The top right corner flips the vote to a Democratic advantage of 51% if the vote fraud feature has been turned on.

If you would like to setup the database differently. It's hidden activation spot is at the top middle of the screen.