Hannah’s Blog

May 19, 2012

Voter assistance needed

Filed under: Helpful hints — Hannah @ 4:15 pm

Why? Because Republicans are trying to thin the electorate. Get more information here.
(more…)

Consistency.

Filed under: Down the drain — Hannah @ 6:19 am

Willard prides himself on it.

I’m not familiar precisely with what I said, but I’ll stand by what I said, whatever it was.

Imitation and repetition are the instinct-drivens’ stock in trade. What was, is and will be forever more — an efficient response, if nothing else.

May 18, 2012

Of Use and Abuse.

Filed under: Hannah's views — Hannah @ 7:04 am

The issue of the 21st Century is whether or not government BY the people is going to be realized. Petty potentates all around the globe are saying, “over my dead body.” In Libya that’s what it took.
(more…)

May 16, 2012

Euphemisms and ulterior motives.

Filed under: Hannah's views — Hannah @ 11:22 am

Those are the essentials of the conservative tool box. Indirection, that’s the ticket. Is it because they do not know themselves or because deception is their natural mode? Like the killdeer?

Anyway, it might be useful to compile a dictionary of euphemisms.

Deficit = impotence

Abortion = spermicide

Marriage = dominion

Resource = exploitable

Competition = destruction

Job = make work

So many negatives. No wonder they need euphemisms!

“Designed to fail.”

Filed under: another perspective, Down the drain — Hannah @ 10:32 am

I’ve been nattering for some time about politicians who seem to have adopted the industrial strategy of designing products to fail after a given period of time (in order to prompt a re-order and re-supply and keep funneling profits into the bottom line), by constructing legislation in such a way that it fails to accomplish its stated ends and provides an excuse for the legislator’s re-election so he can “try and try again.” That is, failure has proved the key to legislator longevity in office and power.
(more…)

The Euro dilemma.

Filed under: Economy, Down the drain — Hannah @ 5:42 am

Getting people hooked on a common currency can be seen as a Trojan horse, designed to gain control over how people sustain themselves without them noticing how it’s done. Blaming an immigrant population, whose migration is largely prompted by the deprivation they experience in their home country as a result of natural resource exploitation my moneyed interest, is an easy out, especially if the immigrants are easy to identify visually or linguistically.
(more…)

May 15, 2012

How Willard Creates Jobs.

Filed under: another perspective — Hannah @ 5:30 am

By prompting people like Lynn Tilton to decide that “enough is enough.”

Well, to be honest, as a neighbor tells it, Lynn Tilton is responsible for the rescue of the paper mill in Gorham, NH because her father came to her in a dream and said that taking the two million dollars from the settlement of her sex discrimination law suit and retiring early was the wrong way to go.
(more…)

France appears not to be deprived. Why?

Filed under: Economy, another perspective, Notes from the Household — Hannah @ 5:29 am

Economics is not concerned with the basics — i.e. exchange and trade of goods and services. Economics is concerned with what can be measured by counting the medium of exchange — i.e. the money. So, whatever activity doesn’t involve the exchange of money as a sort of middleman doesn’t count. What can’t be counted doesn’t count.
(more…)

May 14, 2012

Occupy LA — a report

Filed under: another perspective — Hannah @ 5:59 am

Actually, a reprint from KOS.
(more…)

May 13, 2012

Why are they called “gay”?

Filed under: another perspective — Hannah @ 1:20 am

Because in union they achieve happiness, a condition which contradicts the preferred default, the sadness of the dominated and suppressed. If humans aren’t sad to begin with, how is the promise of a reward in the after-life going to get them to do what they’re told? Psychological domination goes hand in hand with private property. It reinforces the condition that if humans are to survive they must do what they are told — i.e. the culture of obedience requires these constraints.

Gay marriage threatens traditional marriage because it negates the hierarchy of power. The relationship is horizontal, rather than top down. (I picked up that concept from a TED lecture on Howard Moskowitz).
(more…)

Next Page »

Powered by WordPress